Sunday 5th of September 2010 |
header rule
Finchley Progressive Synagogue!
You Are Here:

Parashat Korach - June 20th 2009 (Rabbi Neil Janes)

Posted by Rabbi Neil Janes on 06/26/09

Shabbat Shalom.  I’m delighted to welcome all the family and friends of Sally here this morning, especially, your parents and grandparents.  It has been a real privilege having you lead the service with me this morning and you have made everyone very proud.  It is also a pleasure to welcome the friends and family of Ian and Vicky who are to be married tomorrow.  We wish you all Mazal Tov.

So, those of you who know me will be aware that I don’t really handle authority very well.  You’ve heard me describe hitting my nursery teacher and then telling her if she wasn’t so old I’d hit her again.  Arguing with teachers over lunch-time detentions, the purpose of punishments and my freedom of speech.  By now I’ve probably painted such a picture of myself that, well, my mother would barely recognise her angelic son.

But authority and leadership are not the same thing.  A person can be invested with authority and yet those over whom they have authority may not consider them to be their leader.  Here’s another shameful tale from my school days.  I remember we had a trainee teacher in my primary school. I must have been about 9 or 10 years old.  He had clearly developed a technique which he felt would work to get the class quiet.  When things got too noisy he would ask for quiet by raising both hands in the air.  He notionally was an authority figure, he had been designated with the authority to teach us and yet the instinctive reaction of a few of us to the situation of our teacher asking for quiet in this manner, led to us standing on our chairs and mimicking him.  Not something I’m proud of and we were hauled into the headteacher’s office when it was discovered what we were doing.

On the other hand, some of the most influential leaders in my life have been peers who had not been invested with authority or given power (or even taken it).  Through their behaviour and beliefs I came to see them as leaders and, importantly, exemplars.  Sally, on this Shabbat you have become a leader of this community, not through authority, but through your care, concern and diligence.  At the age of 13 every Bar and Bat Mitzvah is therefore an inspiration for us old folk.

It always fascinates me when, through complete coincidence, the Torah portion seems to reflect a situation in the world.  I suppose we could take the situation in Iran, which grows more complicated as the days pass, the loss of confidence in our Members of Parliament, the criticism sometimes levelled at Gordon Brown as an unelected Prime-minister (however accurate that may be).  The story of Korach is really a timeless narrative.  It will speak to us, probably as long as there are leaders in place.

Sally, in your Davar Torah, your words of Torah, you expertly tell us what the problem is.  On the one hand we have Moses, the appointed leader, appointed by God that is.  He faces a challenge to his leadership which he could well be forgiven for not needing.  After all, as Ibn Ezra notes, it comes on the back of the realisation by the people of Israel that they are to wander the wilderness for 40 years until the generation that left Egypt has died off.  Perfect circumstances to foment a revolt amongst the people who now think of Egypt as flowing with milk and honey and the promised land as unattainable.

On the other hand, we have Korach, of the tribe of Levi and his followers, who appear to be a rabble brought together under a unifying banner.  Korach claims, quite legitimately, or so it would seem, that all the people are holy and who is Moses to set himself above them.

As I have mentioned in the past, the true historical reality of the rebellion of Korach is shrouded in mystery, but experts suggest that this was more than one rebellion or at least there is more than one issue at stake.  The leadership of Moses is challenged, whilst at the same time the priestly leadership of Aaron is also under attack.  This speaks to our liberal democratic inclinations because most of us oppose theocracy as a system of governance – the rule of God is the law and God’s agents, selected as such, have the power to enforce, adapt or prescribe the laws.  That sounds like the opposite to the claim ‘all of Israel is holy’.  Something that in turn sounds more like democracy to our ears.  We should all have the right to lead or at least select our leaders.

But is that what Korach really wants?  I’m not so sure.  I think his uprising has much more to do with a selfish urge for power than real equality for all the people.  After all, Moses has already relayed the words of God that all the people are holy if they follow God’s commandments.  There is no question about that and Moses does not seem to think otherwise.  Korach and the rebels really seem to be jealous and power hungry.  On the one hand they don’t like the religious leadership offered by Aaron, but do not for one moment level any kind of criticism at their own elevated position as Levites in the tabernacle.  On the other hand, they don’t seem to be suggesting another viable alternative for the equivalent of what we might term ‘civil’ leadership under Moses.  Remember democracy did not exist at this point in time.

It’s the sort of bland rally cry that should make us all think.  When a politician says ‘Education for all’ or that they support the Health service, what we should really ask is, ‘What on earth do you mean by that?’  Catch phrases and tag lines are very easy to put on stickers but less straightforward to make sense of.  They can also be causing a disparate bunch of people to unite under a common banner when, in the finer details, the people have serious opposition to one another.

What this rebellion hammers home is that though certain people may crave power and authority, it is not always wise for them to have it because, though they lead in glory, their purpose is subversive and destructive.

Moses on the other hand is in danger of becoming sucked into the murky world of wielding power and authority unfairly and losing humility.  In the past, he has sought counsel from God and ascribed the decision to God.  In this story there are subtle changes and, perhaps through the frustration of leadership, he begins to become arrogant and egotistical.  But not too much.  As the JPS commentary notes:

“One should not lose sight of the chasm that separates Msoes from the dictators of history.  With the power at his command, a flick of his finger would have sufficed to have the rebels executed.  That he leaves their fate to God suffices in itself to refute the charge that he had assumed absolute power…He is always ready to intercede for his people…cannot be accused of seeking personal gain.  Most important of all he is even eager that others achieve his prophetic power…In the human record, he remains the leader par excellence.”
(JPS Torah Commentary, Numbers, p.422-423)

Sally, you have come a long way in this journey towards Bat Mitzvah.  I think your parents have too and it is wonderful to be able to celebrate with you.  For some reason, when you came up to the bimah last Monday to rehearse it felt very powerful.  Perhaps it is because you are someone who through quiet endeavour has accomplished a wonderful thing by leading us this morning.  A demonstration if ever we needed it that to be led does not need to be about big and loud personalities, in fact, personality is not as important as intention and method.  Sally, this moment is a reminder to us all about the significance of leadership to all of us.  Perseverance and personal endeavour are within all of our hands, the potential is there, but will we, as you have done, choose to make it real?

Sally, as the hard work comes to an end, for this morning at least, my hopes for you are that you will always strive towards your goals.  That you will happily lead when the time is right and constructively be led at other times.  That through a self awareness you will be able to see when you are arguing solely for nothing but self-glory, like Korach, an when you are arguing for the goodness, the sake of heaven, like Jews have done for centuries.  May your journey in challenging times, when the paths are less clear to you, be supported by your family and friends and when there are moments of celebration and achievement, like today, may they also be there to share the joy with you.  You have made everyone very proud and may you always continue so to do.  May this be God’s will, Keyn yehi ratzon and let us say: Amen.

Parashat Behaalotecha - June 6th 2009 (Rabbi Neil Janes)

Posted by Rabbi Neil Janes on 06/08/09

Shabbat Shalom. I’m delighted to welcome the family and friends of Emma to this Shabbat service.  Emma, not that we had any doubt about your abilities, you have done a wonderful job in reading the Torah and leading the service with me.  You have made everyone very proud.  You’ve certainly come out of the shadow of your bossy older sister!

But today is not about Joanna, but rather you Emma.  Emma the fussy eater.  I’d be pretty happy eating Manna, Emma.  That’s not such a bad admission to make.  It’s not quite in the league of the young person who was on a summer camp one year when I was a Rabbi on camp.  She insisted that she would only drink sparkling mineral water, preferably of the Perrier variety (though other mineral waters ‘con gaz’ are available).  Not only that, her mother shipped a load to her during camp because we refused to spend the entire budget on mineral water, prioritising medical staff and site costs for some reason.  But then she was also the person who would only eat plain pasta with no sauce and grated cheese.  Talk about a nightmare for the cooks on site.  They would spend hours preparing food for over 120 people and then have to cook a small pot of pasta just for one person – and we’re not talking allergies here.  I know that, because frequently she would see the fish fingers and chips or veggie burgers and beans and suddenly her unique tastes would evaporate and she would devour her neighbour’s plate of food.  It almost got to the point where senior staff wanted to insist she only ate her pasta because it was being prepared especially for her.

Contrast that with the member of a community I once worked in who survived the war in France, escaping from the horrors of the Nazis and eating scraps of food wherever she could find them.  Appropriate to think abuot this weekend with the commemoration of D-Day today.  This led to an understandable almost compulsion to never let food get thrown away.  She would hate the wastage.  We’re talking 60 years on and the compulsion is as strong as ever – at Kiddush the anguish was plain to see for all and she would tell me how difficult it was for her to see food chucked in the bin.

My generation, living in the UK, knows nothing of rations.  Sure, we see poverty and there are a great number of people living in poor socio-economic conditions, but we are still a rich nation (just – no party political broadcast is intended).  My mother, though she might not be happy for me mentioning this, used to unpick the collars and cuffs on my father’s shirt and sew them on the other way round to make them last longer.  In an age of primark and tescos can you imagine doing that?  We’d sooner discard and buy new for a couple of pounds than do that.

I’m probably preaching to the converted here in shul – well some of you anyway.  I think, one of the ennobling features of religion, very often, is to be thankful for what we have.  To recognise that our material possessions are not the most important thing in the world – they’re important but not the most important.  As I have repeated frequently, in Judaism the normative voice of the religion does not preach for a complete giving up of material possessions, or for outright materialism.  Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks, in his book ‘Radical Then, Radical Now’ has an interpretation of the teaching, ‘If I am not for myself, who is for me?  If I am only for myself, what am I?  If not now, when?’  He suggests that what this means is that we should be concerned for ourselves, but we should not only be concerned for ourselves.  Neither classical forms of capitalism or socialism.  Money, in other words, is not the be all and end all.

That’s not to say you can’t have the same values if you’re not religious.  It is absolutely possible and many do.  However, religion can assist us in realising the valuable in our lives – through our prayer, the obligation to give tzedakah (charity) and so on.

But Emma, there is something quite odd about the story you have read for us today.  It is not that the people yearn for a former life which had stability even if it was hard.  Truth be told, I imagine life generally for the ‘peasant’ class was pretty tough going slave or not.  What is strange is, as the great Ramban (Nachmanides) says:

“They lacked nothing in the wilderness, for they were full from the manna and could make it taste like many different things.”

So why do they long for something else to eat?  I’d be pretty happy if I had a food which could be turned into anything I fancied at the time.  Certainly I wouldn’t long for the fish, cucumbers, melons, onions, garlic and leeks – though Jamie Oliver could probably whip up a pucker dinner from that.  But if Egypt was school dinners, manna was cordon bleu – at least potentially.  So why complain?

Ramban answers his question by stating that “the people were seized with a ravenous hunger, like one which makes you want to eat coal or earth.”  Apologies if you’re pregnant and having just such cravings.  In other words, they wanted something, anything, different.

Recently there was a story on the news about soldiers’ rations.  Apparently the rations are being spruced up a bit to give some different flavours and varied diets.  One soldier described how, before the change, for 60 days he ate the same meal in the mess in Afghanistan because of how the rotation of food worked – the new rations were to deal with that problem.  Hearing it like that I suppose you can understand the human need to eat something different, to grow bored with the ‘same thing...everyday…’.  Maybe that was the Israelites’ problem?

Let me add a further twist to the tale though.  One might ask, why do the Israelites refer to the fish which was eaten ‘freely’ in Egypt.  Was the fish really free? Ask some commentators.  The answers given vary, but the one which I was most drawn to suggests that the fish was indeed given freely, by Pharaoh.  But not for some altruistic purpose.  Rather, the teaching was as follows:

Imagine, a person has an animal that they use for labour – perhaps a horse, or ox.  Someone who has the interests of the welfare of their animal in mind will work it for a reasonable amount and then feed it as much as it needs.  However, the person who has no concern for the welfare of their animal will feed it double or perhaps triple and then get twice or thrice the amount of work out of it that is reasonable to expect.  Thus, over-working it and caring not about the life and only for the work.  This, according to the teaching, is what Pharaoh did to the Israelite slaves.  They were given fish freely, but only so that double or triple the amount of work could be got out of them.

The tragedy, implied by the teaching, is that the riff-raff and the Israelites, by this time in their wanderings remember only the free fish but have forgotten the lack of freedom, the slavery, the loss of life and punishment – the absence of values which have a universal significance.  Through rose-tinted glasses they look back on what was and become cynical and ungrateful of what they have in the wilderness – the lose perspective and a sense of what is important.

I wonder if we can be guilty of the same today?  I would like to leave that as a question.  The Israelites look back fondly on a time of hardship, during a time that should, in theory have been the most optimistic and joyful.  They have encountered God, they have entered into a covenant voluntarily and they have been provided for.  They are on the way to settle in a land without the bonds of slavery.  And yet, all they can do is think of the free fish.  ‘It was better back then’ is a not unfamiliar cry even today.  Sometimes it was better and sometimes it most definitely was not.  The question for me though is not how we long for a time when ‘fish was free’, but how we continue to strive to maintain sight on what is important.  The congregant whom I mentioned at the start of the sermon who lived during the war in Europe – she doesn’t for one minute long for a bygone time.  Rather, this experience has forced her to learn a valuable lesson – you would never hear her demand sparkling water over a glass of tap water.

Emma, you and I, though I find it tough to admit it, are not of the same generation - just as I am not of the same generation as your parents!  You will grow up with experiences that my generation will have to learn to come to terms with.  Whereas we find them unique, novel and perhaps threatening for you they will seem natural.  Your manna will be different from mine and your wilderness different from your parents.  However, what will remain true will be the eternal and universal values: like gratitude for that which you have been blessed with, the sanctity of human life, the duty to take care of the world, the respect and equal treatment of the stranger, the pursuit of justice, seeking out peace.  So my wish for you today, as you become Bat Mitzvah, is that you will always appreciate the important things in life. It is easy, having grown up in times of plenty, to forget the blessing of manna.  Always show, as I have seen in you, an ability to remember to value what you’ve got, to respect and care for those around you, to give the earth a second chance, perhaps even to be prepared to unpick the collars on your shirts and sew them back on the other way round.  And whereas the Israelites of your Torah portion looked back to times past through rose-tinted spectacles, may you always look forward to a better, repaired world in the future.  And may you always make your family and friends and yourself as proud as you have done today.  May this be God’s will and let us say: Amen.

Naso - May 30th 2009 (Rabbi Neil Janes)

Posted by Rabbi Neil Janes on 06/03/09

I’m delighted to welcome here Leo and all of your family, particularly your grandparents.  It has been a pleasure having you on the bimah with me this morning and you have made everyone very proud.

Leo, I wonder if you have ever made new year’s resolutions.  If you have you’re definitely not alone. We all do it.  Why do you think on television the commercials are full of health and fitness videos after New Years Day?  It happens again around this time of year because everyone is worried how they will look on the beach in the Summer.  As I’m sure you can all tell, that’s been my main concern for the last few weeks – thanks for all your comments.

Seriously though, we make promises to ourselves all the time: how we’ll behave, what we’ll do/learn/think about, stay in touch with family, cope with our emotions.  The difficulty is these promises are often made at the wrong time – in the heat of the moment or because of some kind of psychological/emotional pressure…“I promise I’m never going to do that again” we futilely utter.

My favourite type, and I’m assured I’m not alone in this by someone who worked in the gym business, is ‘If I go to the gym four times a week then it’s only costing me £4 a visit’.  Of course, what normally happens is a very keen couple of weeks and then nothing – which means each visit is actually costing about £100 a time.  Learning to see the reality and make good judgements is much more difficult and occasionally comes with personal growth and is much healthier, even if it means we have to acknowledge our weaknesses.

Of course, most of the time we do this, it is for an imagined benefit – for the good of our health, so the motives are generally good.  Vanity aside, we hope that the gym membership, the new diet routine, the pop-psychology will improve our well being.  The industry which sells us the self-help, health improvement regimes, knows that we are all susceptible to the promises we make to ourselves – the vows.  Of course, with the hint of cynicism which I’m afraid I suffer from, I know full well that the industry depends on us failing – otherwise when the next fad comes along we won’t buy into it.

But what if the promise we make to ourselves is a religious one – a vow?  Leo, in some respects you made a promise to yourself in accomplishing all that you have today.  And you have achieved it – weekly attending lessons, daily practicing, coming to services, coming to classes on Sunday mornings – most of these done with a reasonable degree of regularity.  Certainly a better record than gym membership for most of the adults here I can tell you – no offense.  And your commitment has not only been to yourself, it has been to our community, to your family and to a deeper and more profound sense of the importance of Judaism.

But I wonder, Leo, what if the religious commitment, the vows, become extreme.  Certainly I know people who have become, what I would consider, religiously extreme – though in their minds they are not and they have whole communities built up around them which reinforce that view.  An unhealthy commitment to religious practice, to the exclusion of all other life and people – often having very little to do with one’s self and everything to do with a belief in what God demands. A disproportionate critique of their current lives leads to a disproportionate reaction against it. And this is, more often than not, accompanied by a belief in their superior religious commitment when compared to others around them.

This is really the vow of the Nazirite which you read so brilliantly for us today.  The Nazirite makes a vow to devote him or herself to God and consequently becomes bound to certain laws, including not cutting one’s hair, not coming into contact with any wine or grape products used to make wine and not coming into contact with death.  The Nazirite effectively strives to remove him or herself from the community.  Seeking holiness and superior religious observance by leaving the world.  The Nazirite abstains in the extreme in an effort to become holy and serve God.

As you can probably tell, I remain unconvinced by this mode of life.  In some ways, though the commitment is admirable it feels to me as much self-gratification as the narcissism we accuse the modern world to be guilty of.  It is not an easy path, but isolating oneself from one’s community feels somehow like an escape not facing up to the problem.

A close reading of the Torah echoes a note of caution.  As noted by my teacher Rabbi Chaim Weiner, in the portion as a whole, we have the case of the Princes of the tribes, the rich and wealthy, who, when bringing offerings, all have to bring offerings identical to each other.  Whilst the Nazirite is obligated to bring a sin offering at the end of his or her service.

In other words, we have the rich, self-important Princes who, would they be permitted, could, through their riches, one-up those less wealthy.  On the other hand, we have the denial of the Nazirite, abstaining, self-centred removal from the world.  Whereas the Princes are forced to bring a standardised  offering – forbidding their demonstration of wealth, the Nazirite brings a sin-offering at the end of his or her term to reflect a voice of disapproval.  “You can do it, and we accept the reality of both worlds, but be cautious”, says the Torah.

But Leo, there is one other aspect of the Nazirite which worries me.  It is that which I hinted at earlier.  You see, the Sages from 2000 years ago were also worried about the Nazirite and there are voices of caution within the rabbinic literature.  These voices of caution reflect both a broader concern for not making vows that are unattainable, remember our gym membership.  But they also develop caution from the sin-offering of the Nazir.  In Judaism there is a general emphasis found on a middle way – avoiding the excesses of either extreme asceticism or materialism.  Normative Judaism, as it has developed, has rarely encouraged escape from this world – rather it places an emphasis on changing the world.

This caution, I think must continue to be voiced today.  Though the specific practice of being a Nazirite has discontinued, there are still groups which attempt to delineate ever more excessive forms of religious observance.  They tend not to be ascetic like the Nazirite, but they still attempt to be ‘better’ Jews than the rest of the community.  Going to extremes and regarding their co-religionists as inadequate.

Rabbi Richard Hirsch of the Jewish Reconstructionist Federation writes about this modern phenomena that resembles naziriteship:

"While the inclination towards religious devotion is admirable, it also carries with it the risk of creating a hierarchy of devotees, whose scrupulousness suggests that lesser observance is inadequate. Within the observant Jewish community today there exists a fringe element devoted to discovering ever more rigorous levels of observance, and having found them, this element seeks to discover even more ways in which they can refine their religious performance…"

Regrettably, what often starts out as a quest to strengthen one's own religious identity can result in the adoption of a severe lifestyle which in fact separates one from one's community or family. The ceaseless quest in some quarters of our community to discover ever more restrictive decisors with regard to kashrut, for example, suggests not merely a devotion to the dietary regulations, but a desire to "rise above" those who would settle for "merely acceptable" levels of supervision… "

For better or worse, the tradition seems to have sanctioned the desire on the part of some to achieve a special status, but this desire was circumscribed in ways that minimized the possibility of creating a caste of "Superjews" whose devotion might have suggested their superiority."

I would go slightly further than Rabbi Hirsch though.  I would suggest that this form of religious devotion reinforces a hierarchy of Jews.  From the worst type to the best.  With only the upper tiers reflecting authentic Judaism.  By the way, from this perspective, progressive Judaism is probably the worst because whereas a secular Jew rejects everything, as Liberal Jews we ‘claim’ to be religious and teach heresy.

From my point of view, as you might expect, this hierarchical vision of Judaism is inadequate in appreciating true expressions of it.  I am deliberately avoiding the use of the word authentic because it is so problematic, but if you like “Eilu ve’eilu divrei elohim chayim” – these and these are authentic expressions of interpretation of the words of the living God.

A vision of diverse and profoundly meaningful expressions of Judaism is surely more positive than one that has a hierarchy with only the most extreme considered to be ‘the best’.

This was reflected in a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Israel, which only last week rule in a ground breaking case brought by the Israel Religious Action Centre that the government must allocate funds to conversion programmes for the Progressive and Conservative movements arguing that:

“The duty of the State to pluralism is not only a passive duty, but an active one as well.” And that “Jews in Israel cannot be seen as only one religious sect.”

Judaism is not defined by one religious denomination and this ruling reinforces the rightful place of progressive Judaism in Israel (and the world) along side other denominations and even those that tend towards the extremes of Naziriteship.

Leo, what you have accomplished today is part of the rich and diverse world of Judaism.  Becoming Bar Mitzvah is an accomplishment, the first step on a journey of commitment to what it means to be Jewish, with your Kabbalat Torah service in two years as a class.  This is a marvelous opportunity to celebrate a truly meaningful and significant rite of passage for you and your community. I know it has been quite a journey for you and your family and it was one that you chose, like the Nazirite of your Torah portion.  You have shown to us all today that authentic Judaism is not about ever more extreme practices, but a genuine and real commitment to explore your heritage and learn from the wisdom of our ancestors.  But there is more to it, yet to come.  Leo, my wish for you is that the learning will never stop.  That your commitment to Judaism will not cease, that you will discover its potential to be profoundly meaningful and sustaining for your sense of self.  Judaism, at least as expressed in Liberal Judaism, is not about the elevating the ritualistic elements – abstinence or excess – above the moral imperative to make the world a better place.  Quite the opposite.  Our rituals may enhance our lives, they may focus our minds on what is important, they may sustain us and give us courage or challenge us to be different.  But they are never more important than leading a life in the pursuit of justice and peace in the world.  In the words of the prophet Micah (6:8):

It has been told to you what is good, and what the Eternal One requires of you: only to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

So Leo, may you take these lessons with you in your life and may you always make your family and friends and your community as proud of you as they are today.  May this be God’s will, and let us say: Amen.


bottom
Powered by Exponent Content Management System    Exponent CMS Copyright© OIC Group, Inc 2006